Senator Baldwin to Trump Administration: Wisconsin Farmers Need Better Access to Paycheck Protection Program Now

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Tammy Baldwin is calling for action from the Trump administration to help Wisconsin farmers access the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) Paycheck Protection Program (PPP).

 

Senator Baldwin has heard from struggling family farmers that are falling through the cracks in the PPP because of how the program determines applicant eligibility. The PPP bases loans on either the business’ payroll costs or its net earnings. Businesses that lost money in 2019 are allowed to access PPP, but many of these businesses can use their payroll costs to apply for a loan. Many small farms don’t have a payroll and because trade wars and oversupply pushed prices down, many farmers didn’t have positive net earnings in 2019, and therefore can’t access the PPP.

 

In her letter to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and SBA Administrator Jovita Carranaza, Senator Baldwin urged the Trump administration to issue new guidance to allow farms to access the PPP based on an alternate metric: their 2019 earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization are removed, also known as EBITDA.

 

Baldwin writes, “Many Wisconsin farmers are shut out of the PPP despite the SBA’s interim final rule that suggests that sole proprietors who did not have positive net earnings in 2019 would be able to use other records to determine their maximum loan amounts. The SBA’s interim final rule released on April 2, 2020 states that for sole proprietors, “wage, commissions, income, or net earnings from self-employment or similar compensation,” qualify as “payroll costs” for the purposes of determining the applicant’s maximum loan amount. Yet SBA has not allowed Wisconsin farmers and their lenders to use any other calculation besides average monthly payroll or net earnings.

 

She continues, “Wisconsin farmers support the economy by investing in seed, fertilizer and other inputs, machinery, and agriculture services that drive rural economic activity in their communities.  Yet these farmers are shut out of the PPP if those investments pushed the farm’s net earnings negative in 2019. Companies who did not post a profit in 2019 still can access the PPP by basing their maximum loan amounts on their payroll costs. However, because many Wisconsin farms do not have a payroll—and were not profitable given the extremely difficult market conditions—they are shut out of the program. The SBA’s exclusion hits Wisconsin’s many family farms especially hard.

 

Baldwin concludes, “Please let me or my office know if we can be of assistance in getting much needed assistance to Wisconsin’s farmers as they fight to keep their farms while working day in and day out to make sure Americans have a steady supply of food.”

 

The full letter is available below and here.

 

An online version of this release is available here.

 

 

Dear Secretary Mnuchin and Administrator Carranza:

 

I write to you today about the ability of Wisconsin’s farmers to access the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) included in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. The collapse in demand from the coronavirus pandemic catches Wisconsin’s farms at a particularly challenging time, many have suffered for years from depressed prices and the uncertainty from trade wars. For this reason, many Wisconsin farms, especially small ones with few or no employees, did not report earnings in 2019.  Many of these farms have been excluded from the PPP because the SBA established rules that essentially require a farm to either be profitable in 2019 or have payroll costs in order to be eligible for the program. I ask that you issue new guidance to allow farms on which family members provide unpaid labor to access the PPP based on 2019 earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization are removed.

 

Many Wisconsin farmers are shut out of the PPP despite the SBA’s interim final rule that suggests that sole proprietors who did not have positive net earnings in 2019 would be able to use other records to determine their maximum loan amounts. The SBA’s interim final rule released on April 2, 2020 states that for sole proprietors, “wage, commissions, income, or net earnings from self-employment or similar compensation,” qualify as “payroll costs” for the purposes of determining the applicant’s maximum loan amount. Yet SBA has not allowed Wisconsin farmers and their lenders to use any other calculation besides average monthly payroll or net earnings.

 

Wisconsin farmers support the economy by investing in seed, fertilizer and other inputs, machinery, and agriculture services that drive rural economic activity in their communities.  Yet these farmers are shut out of the PPP if those investments pushed the farm’s net earnings negative in 2019. Companies who did not post a profit in 2019 still can access the PPP by basing their maximum loan amounts on their payroll costs. However, because many Wisconsin farms do not have a payroll—and were not profitable given the extremely difficult market conditions—they are shut out of the program. The SBA’s exclusion hits Wisconsin’s many family farms especially hard.

 

I thank you for your attention to this matter. Please let me or my office know if we can be of assistance in getting much needed assistance to Wisconsin’s farmers as they fight to keep their farms while working day in and day out to make sure Americans have a steady supply of food.

 

Sincerely,

Source: WRJC.com

WISCONSINREPORT.COM (WiscReport.com) is not affiliated with Wisconsin Government or any state agency, department, entity, or other website or printed publication with Wisconsin in it’s name. Established in 2002, we operate completely independent from political parties and other forms of outside influence. Our Mission is to report the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. We are WiscReport on Twitter and Facebook. A Morbizco Internet Media online publication. – WisconsinReport.com.

Learn More about WisconsinReport.com.

---